On Sunday May 7, 2006, John Naughon of The Observer wrote a piece titled A problem too jumbo-sized for Bill Gates to solve?. In general, this was quite positive towards open source software, however there were a few points where John didn't fully appreciate or understand the the key differences between the Microsoft approach towards developing software, and the open source one. What follows is an email I sent to John clarifying a few of these differences.
[ more.. ]
Response to John Naughon@The
Observer re: Bill Gates
jumbo-size problem
May 7, 2006, 6:00 pm
Response to Michael Goulde's
comments re: OpenOffice.org
May 6, 2006, 12:32 pm
CIO Today ran a piece on open source software and included some comments from Forrester's Michael Goulde, who made some rather disparaging comments about OpenOffice.org. What follows is my response, sent to both Michael and the editors of CIO Today.
[ more.. ]
[ more.. ]
Open letter to academics on
Microsoft's 2020 Science
Group
May 2, 2006, 12:43 pm
The Age newspaper's IT section had a front-page article discussing a letter sent by a group of women researchers to Bill Gates about Microsoft's 2020 Science Group programme. In essence, the women were raising the issue that no women researchers were included in that group. I decided to write my own letter in response to some of these women researchers, pointing out that there may be better ways to harness womens' research energies towards a better world in 2020, than by aligning themselves to Microsoft.
[ more.. ]
[ more.. ]
Page :
1
